Wikicitáty:Krčma/Technické/Archív

Abc vs. abecednyzoznam

Neuro, nevidím význam (alebo výhody) boxu {{abecednyzoznam}} keď už je vyrobený a niekoľko krát upravovaný box {{Abc}} má to význam, vyrábať niečo duplicitné? Možno tvoj box vie niečo o čom ja netuším, kto vie?

Usporiadanie dialógov

Mali by sme sa tu konečne dohodnúť, ako budeme písať dialógy najmä pri seriáloch. Máme viacero variánt, pričom každá má niekoľko pozitív a zároveň negatív. Tu sú:

1. spôsob: (nove dialogy su oddelene prazdnym riadkom)

• Osoba A: text
• Osoba B: text
• Osoba C: text

atď.

---

2. spôsob: (nove dialogy oddelene znova odriadkovanim)

• Osoba A: text
  • Osoba B: text
• Osoba C: text
  • Osoba B: text

atď.

---

3. spôsob: (nie je potrebne odriadkovavat)

• Osoba A: text
  • Osoba B: text
    • Osoba C: text
      • Osoba A: text

atď.

---

4. spôsob:

• • Osoba A text
    • Osoba A text
  • Osoba A text
    • Osoba A text
  • Osoba A text
    • Osoba A text
  • Osoba A text

Moje poznámky: Podľa mňa je prvý spôsob jednoznačne najmenej prehľadný a nevhodný. Druhý spôsob má nelogické rozdelenie jednotlivych riadkov nakoľko sa do dialogu pridala nova osoba (C) ktora je opticky na urovni A pricom ziadna logicka spojitost medzi nimi nie je. A treti spôsob menej esteticky a pri dlhych dialogoch ma velku sirku, ale je prehladny a logicky, a preto sa k nemu prihovaram.

Prosím vyjadrite sa k jednotlivým spôsobom.

Som za 3. spôsob. --Neuromancer 13:59, 3 jún 2006 (UTC)

ja som za druhy, lebo pri dlhsich dialogoch je treti moc do prava, pri 4-5 replikach je to este v pohode ale ked ich je 7-8 tak je to imho neunosne... --KOR 14:08, 3 jún 2006 (UTC)

co tak sposob 4 :D, to je upraveny druhy s tym, ze by nemusela byt medzera medzi dvoma dialogmi a ani to pri viac replikach netaha do prava... --KOR 20:52, 3 jún 2006 (UTC)

---

- čo tak piaty spôsob:

5. spôsob:

• Osoba A: text
  • Osoba B: text
    • Osoba C: text
• Osoba A: text
  • • Osoba C: text
  • Osoba B: text
    • Osoba C: text

- každá osoba v inom odseku. Ja sa prihovaram za ten môj (v podstate pre mňa je to jedno, ja tych textov z filmov veľa nedam, takže môj hlas berte iba čisto ako informatívny)--ham 22:18, 3 jún 2006 (UTC)

• Z logickeho hladiska je najlepsi sposob ten 5. -posledny, lenze je uzasne neesteticky a neprehladny- 4. je le obmenou 2. cize neprehladnost tiez ostala... myslim, ze by sme sa mali dohodnut ze budeme davat max. 5,6 riadkov na dialog usporiadanych 3. spôsobom. hm? (pozrem este ako toto vyriesili na en) --Neuromancer 06:42, 4 jún 2006 (UTC)
  • mno imho mohlo by byt tak... do tych ale ja by som povedal 4-5 replik sposob 3 a na 6 a viac sposob 4 --KOR 09:51, 4 jún 2006 (UTC)
    • Tak dobre teda tak. Suhlas s KOR-om. Ale mali by sme sa snažiť nedavať sem veľké dialógy. --Neuromancer 14:22, 4 jún 2006 (UTC)
      • Premyslel som to este raz a zmenil som nazor :) Tak ako to myslel KOR to bude ok. Ked to porovnavam s ostatnymi wikicitátmi tak to mame dobre. Treba niekde v navode alebo tak zapisat, ze samostatne citaty budu oznacene jednou * a dialogy dvoma ** --Neuromancer 16:25, 4 jún 2006 (UTC)
        • mno tak teraz ako si to myslel ako ja? som zmateny :D, vsetko sposobom 4 ci do isteho poctu sposob 3 a potom sposob 4??? omg mam v tom gulas :) daj tu dole vzor ako to ma vyzerat a bude tak :)--KOR 14:11, 5 jún 2006 (UTC)
          • Vsetko podla teba :) teda: --Neuromancer 14:45, 5 jún 2006 (UTC)

• • A
    • B
  • A
    • C

oki :D --KOR 14:52, 5 jún 2006 (UTC)

podobne a opak

doplnam sablony podobne a opak, usporiadavam ich-najprv podobne az potom opak, iked to nieje podla abecedy, ale tie obalky co su tam (zlta a cervena) imho je lepsie ked je prva zlta a druha cervena, a aj najprv clovek hlada podobne, az potom opacne slova si myslim --KOR 08:04, 23 júl 2006 (UTC)

• Ako je pekne ze si sa tak rozhodol, ale mal si pockat na vyjadrenie dalsich ludi a potom s niecim zacat. My sme na tuto temu uz debatovali a dohodli sa na niecom tak preco ty sam bez diskusie s hocikym to zacnes menit? --Neuromancer 20:42, 23 júl 2006 (UTC)

nevpostrehol diskusiu, a nebral som to ako dohodnute lebo na vacsine stranok kde boli podobne aj opak tak to bolo v poradi podobne, opak

a dalsia vec, imho by to nemal byt problem zmenit, ak sa na to pouzije nejaky bot (ktorych je na wiki dost a nepochybujem, ze zvladnu taku pracu) a bota pouzit aj na sablony potvrdene, vyroky,... (tie u osob), lebo to sa mi zda, ze ste nieco riesili, ze tie sablony niesu dobre a treba ich nahradit klasickymi nadpismi--KOR 20:59, 23 júl 2006 (UTC)

a aj ked na hlavnej strane pouzijem "pridaj slovo" najprv su podobne, potom opacne (a ked uz som pritom, mozno by bolo dobre zmenit (v kategoriach) slovo na pagename)--KOR 21:10, 23 júl 2006 (UTC)

Nazdar chlapi, Neuro ma pravdu, o tom sme uz rozpravali a asi sme to nedotiahli do uplneho konca (teda je dobre este zmenit sablonu). ked budem doma tak to mozem upravit (ak to neurobite vy). V podstate ak to bude jednotne (co do farieb a rovnakej upravy) budem iba rad, budem sa riadit lepsim navrhom. --ham 07:57, 24 júl 2006 (UTC)

KOR mas pravdu. Ale na taketo veci skutocne treba bota. A ja neviem ako sa na wiki pouzivaju resp. by som si aj chcel napisat vlastneho lenze neviem c++ ci co sa na to pouziva. C som sa kedysi zacal ucit a pascal sa ucim teraz alebo aj PHP. Ak teda vies ako na to tak to pls. zariad a porob taketo veci pretoze tych slov je fakt dost na par ludi. --Neuromancer 08:31, 24 júl 2006 (UTC)

na wikibotov sa mi zda, sa pouziva python, ja neviem s tym robit, ale imho by sa dali pouzit nejake boty co pracuju na slovenskej wikipedii, urcite dokazu zamenit nejaky text za iny, takze teraz otazka, co chceme zamienat? predpokladam, ze sablony potvrdene, vyroky, ... a ine pouzite pri osobach a zamenit ich za standardne nadpisy (+ to co je pod nimi kurzivou napisane), ci? --KOR 09:46, 24 júl 2006 (UTC)

a ked sa zhodneme, tak skusim dakoho z wikipwdiw co operuje s botom poprosit, aby spojazdnil nejakeho aj na wikiquote--KOR 09:47, 24 júl 2006 (UTC)

Lokálne používanie

Chlapi, dá sa stiahnut na HDD celý obsah Wikicitátov. Nechcel by som ani vkladať, iba čisto používať citáty bez toho aby som bol na nete. Niekde som počul že to ide. Može mi niekto (alebo iba Neuro? :-) dať nejaký postup ako to urobiť? Vďaka.

• Mas dve moznosti: Prva: stiahnut slovenské wikicitáty odtialto: skwikiquote, co neviem ako dopadne, lebo to stiahne xml subor a s tym som si moc rady nevedel. Druha: Dat stiahnut stranku sk.wikiquote.org cez nejaky program, napr. WebZip. Tam si nastavis ci chces stahovat aj obrazky, ci ma stahovat aj odkazy a co je za nimi apod. (pozor aby si nenastavil ze ma stahovat aj odkazy na ine servery, lebo je to potom schopne stahnut cely internet :))) WebZip by si mal najst napr. na serveri slunecnize.cz myslim. --Neuromancer 14:12, 21 jún 2006 (UTC)

skusil som to iba cez spiderzilla ale bolo to na ... skusim tvoju druhu moznost (ked si si v prvej ty nevedel rady co uz ja obycajny uzivatel)--ham 14:22, 21 jún 2006 (UTC)

• webzip neni zrovna lahky na pouzivanie ale treba trpezlivost a naucit sa to s nim. a k tej mojej prvej moznosti: je program xml view tiez ho najdes na slunecnice.cz ktory ten xml subor precita. --Neuromancer 14:40, 21 jún 2006 (UTC)

Pozadie

Mala otazka: vie niekto preco je pozadie stranky wikiquote take ake je? Nejaka kvetinka seda ci co to tam je. Hm? --Neuromancer 10:22, 20. november 2006 (UTC)

• • Podla mna to nie je seda kvetinka ale otvorena kniha. Mozno ze mam bujnu fantaziu ale toto mi z toho vychadza :-)--ham 00:39, 21. november 2006 (UTC)
    • nemas je to jasna otvorena kniha :D http://sk.wikiquote.org/skins-1.5/monobook/headbg.jpg --Kandy Talbot 00:13, 2. január 2007 (UTC)

Stratene v preklade

Ja len aby otom bol zaznam a nezlakli ste sa ake veci som pomenil. Tak par podstatnych.

1. pridane hlavne kategorie v lavej navigacii (k ostatnym kategoriam sa da cez ne preklikat - nechcem tam davat viac koli tomu ze mam navigaciu fixnutu)
2. rozna rekategorizacia a vytvorenie novych, ale hlavne odstranene kategorie Povolanie A-Z koli prehladnosti (bol vtom bordel co sa Tém tyka). Asi ste si pri vytvarani neuvedomili ze slo len o zrkadlovu kategorizaciu casto jednoclennej povahy. Takze vznikla cista Kategória:Povolania kde vidiet vsetky podkategorie. Témy som dal do Kategória:Povolanie (lebo ked to bolo v Povolanie X tak to bolo totalne neefektivne a listovanie abecedou, keby toho bolo uz naozaj vela, sa da vyriesit aj technicky zdatnejsie vid ako som to spravil v Kategória:Témy). Zatial tolko k poslednym zasadnejsim zmenam. --Kandy Talbot 12:37, 15. apríl 2007 (UTC)

vidim ze pocas "skoskoveho" obd. nemas co robit ;-) tie povolania boli od zaciatku, ja som tam len pridaval (ale po pravde povedane nepamatam si kedy som hladal cloveka podla povolania - samozrejme ak som bol na dotycnom potom som si rad pozrel jeho kategoriu). pre mna za mna je tato kategoria na hl. stranke zbytocna. mozno by stacil iba ten odkaz co si vyrobil. ja som za.--ham 06:51, 16. apríl 2007 (UTC)

Dobre ze vravis, ja som si ani nevsimol ze su odkazy na hlavnej stranke. O:-) Asi dam racej Top povolania a neaky odkaz "dalsie.." na cely vypis, kedze abeceda je vcelku zbytocna kedze sa vsetky povolania zobrazia na jednej stranke. --Kandy Talbot 08:48, 16. apríl 2007 (UTC)

mož byť, možno by aj temy bolo vhodne upraviť do zakladnych tem (10,20) a tiez abeceda moze ist fuc. moj nazor--ham 11:42, 16. apríl 2007 (UTC)

Sablona Projekt

Este ma napdlo uz mozte pouzivat novu sablonu {{Projekt}} Vklada sa namiesto pozri aj pred externe odkazy. To aby sme boli pekne kompatibilny s wikipediou ;)

Najbežnejšie použitie

== Iné projekty ==
{{projekt|w}}

Upresnenie parametrov:
{{projekt|w=Názov článku|commons=Category:Neco|štítok=Názov članku}}

Len pri novovytvorenych clankoch ich pouzite - nahradzovanie starych budu riesit stroje spolu so synchranizaciou na wikipedii (hned ako si najdem cas). --Kandy Talbot 23:23, 21. máj 2007 (UTC)

Pismenkove kategorie

Škoda že boli v začiatkoch zbytočne vytvorené kategórie písiem. Stačilo by toto:

A· B· C· D· E· F· G· H· I· J· K· L· M· N· O· P· Q· R· S· T· U· V· W· X· Y· Z

Ale nič to. Aspoň pri nových autoroch ich už nepoužívajme. Samozrejme ich ponecháme keď už sú, len ich odlinkujem nech nekazia výpis a snáď časom "vymrú" :) Rozumej keď vás to náhodou napadne odstrelte ich pri úpravách – čiže žiadne ďalšie prečisťovávacie akcie neplánujem ;) — Kandy Talbot 16:22, 30. máj 2007 (UTC)

Bibliografické citácie

Podrobnosti viď Pomoc:Ako citovať. Pre často používané citácie sú vytvárané šablóny citácií kvôli jednotnosti zápisu a efektivite (napr. možnosť nájsť články s citátmi z danej knihy). — Kandy Talbot 05:35, 6. jún 2007 (UTC)

Citát v originálnom jazyku

Ak máme citát aj v originálnom jazyku, vložíme zaň jednu zo šablón originálneho jazyka. Sú vytvárané podľa trojmiestneho kódu jazyka normy ISO 639-2. Výhody: Všetko čo súvisí zo šablónami (jednotnosť zápisu, rýchla zmena, aké citáty máme v jazyku XY atď.) — Kandy Talbot 05:46, 14. jún 2007 (UTC)

Diakritika

• Pri založení témy nepíšeme žiadny triediaci reťazec pri odkaze na kategóriu (predtým sa písal bez diakritiky)
• Pri autoroch píšeme triediaci reťazec s diakritikou račej len raz pred odkazy na kategórie pomocou {{DEFAULTSORT:Priezvisko, Meno}}

Prosím o strpenie s rozpísaním všetkých technických a praktických dôvodov tej diakritiky - zaspávam. O:) Zatiaľ k nahliadnutiu Č — Kandy Talbot 01:52, 2. júl 2007 (UTC)

ja mam cas... :-) --ham 11:34, 2. júl 2007 (UTC)

Bot policy

Hello. To facilitate steward granting of bot access, I suggest implementing the standard bot policy on this wiki. In particular, this policy allows stewards to automatically flag known interlanguage linking bots (if this page says that is acceptable), which form the vast majority of such requests. The policy also enables global bots on this wiki (if this page says that is acceptable), which are trusted bots that will be given bot access on every wiki that allows global bots.

This policy makes bot access requesting much easier for local users, operators, and stewards. To implement it we only need to create a redirect to this page from Project:Bot policy, and add a line at the top noting that it is used here. Please read the text at m:Bot policy before commenting. If you object, please say so; I hope to implement in two weeks if there is no objection, since it is particularly written to streamline bot requests on wikis with little or no community interested in bot access requests. Nemo bis 23:09, 28. September 2009 (UTC)

Implemented. —Pathoschild 06:43:01, 21 november 2009 (UTC)

Logo slovenských Wikicitátov

Zdravím,

ak byste mali záujem o upravené logo navyšej vo vektorovej forme, môžete prebrat to z českých Wikicitátov, kedže nazov je stejný.

— Danny B. 15:03, 24. október 2009 (UTC)

Znemožnění lokálního uploadu

Vzhledem k tomu, že slovenské Wikicitáty nemají povolenu žádnou licenční výjimku a veškerý svobodný multimediální obsah patří na Commons, vypnu tady lokální upload (zůstane povolen pouze pro správce, kteří mohou v případě potřeby aktualizovat logo).

— Danny B. 17:44, 2. október 2013 (UTC)

Súhlasím. Vasiľ (diskusia) 07:54, 3. október 2013 (UTC)

The Wikimedia Developer Summit wants you

The Wikimedia Developer Summit is the annual meeting to push the evolution of MediaWiki and other technologies supporting the Wikimedia movement. The next edition will be held in San Francisco on January 9–11, 2017.

We welcome all Wikimedia technical contributors, third party developers, and users of MediaWiki and the Wikimedia APIs. We specifically want to increase the participation of volunteer developers and other contributors dealing with extensions, apps, tools, bots, gadgets, and templates.

Important deadlines:

• Monday, October 24: last day to request travel sponsorship. Applying takes less than five minutes.
• Monday, October 31: last day to propose an activity. Bring the topics you care about!

More information: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Developer_Summit

Subscribe to weekly updates: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Td5wfd70vptn8eu4

MKramer (WMF) (talk) 14. 10. 2016, 19:07 (UTC)

Developer Wishlist Survey: propose your ideas

At the Wikimedia Developer Summit, we decided to organize a Developer Wishlist Survey, and here we go:

https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developer_Wishlist

The Wikimedia technical community seeks input from developers for developers, to create a high-profile list of desired improvements. The scope of the survey includes the MediaWiki platform (core software, APIs, developer environment, enablers for extensions, gadgets, templates, bots, dumps), the Wikimedia server infrastructure, the contribution process, and documentation.

The best part: we want to have the results published by Wednesday, February 15. Yes, in a month, to have a higher chance to influence the Wikimedia Foundation annual plan FY 2017-18.

There's no time to lose. Propose your ideas before the end of January, either by pushing existing tasks in Phabricator or by creating new ones. You can find instructions on the wiki page. Questions and feedback are welcome especially on the related Talk page.

The voting phase is expected to start on February 6 (tentative). Watch this space (or even better, the wiki page) - SSethi_(WMF) January 21st, 2017 3:07 AM (UTC)

Developer Wishlist Survey: Vote for Proposals

Almost two weeks ago, the Technical Collaboration team invited proposals for the first edition of the Developer Wishlist survey!

We collected around 77 proposals that were marked as suitable for the developer wishlist and met the defined scope and criteria. These proposals fall into the following nine categories: Frontend, Backend, Code Contribution (Process, Guidelines), Extensions, Technical Debt, Developer Environment, Documentation, Tools (Phabricator, Gerrit) and Community Engagement.

Voting phase starts now and will run until February 14th, 23:59 UTC. Click here on a category and show support for the proposals you care for most. Use the 'Vote' and 'Endorse' buttons next to a proposal to do so.

What happens next?
Proposals that will gather most votes will be included in the final results which will be published on Wednesday, February 15th. These proposals will also be considered in the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual plan FY 2017-18 - SSethi_(WMF) (talk) 04:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Improvements coming soon to Recent Changes

Hello

Sorry to use English. Pomôžte prosím s prekladom do svojho jazyka! Děkujeme vám.

In short: starting on 26 September, New Filters for Edit Review (now in Beta) will become standard on Recent Changes. They provide an array of new tools and an improved interface. If you prefer the current page you will be able to opt out. Learn more about the New Filters.

What is this feature again?

This feature improves Special:RecentChanges and Special:RecentChangesLinked (and soon, Special:Watchlist – see below).

Based on a new design, it adds new features that ease vandalism tracking and support of newcomers:

• Filtering - filter recent changes with easy-to-use and powerful filters combinations, including filtering by namespace or tagged edits.
• Highlighting - add a colored background to the different changes you are monitoring. It helps quick identification of changes that matter to you.
• Bookmarking to keep your favorite configurations of filters ready to be used.
• Quality and Intent Filters - those filters use ORES predictions. They identify real vandalism or good faith intent contributions that need help. They are not available on all wikis.

You can know more about this project by visiting the quick tour help page.

Concerning RecentChanges

Starting on 26 September, New Filters for Edit Review will become standard on Recent Changes. We have decided to do this release because of a long and successful Beta test phase, positive feedback from various users and positive user testing.

Some features will remain as Beta features and will be added later. Learn more about those different features.

If your community has specific concerns about this deployment or internal discussion, it can request to have the deployment to their wikis delayed to October 1, if they have sensible, consistent with the project, actionable, realistic feedback to oppose (at the development team's appreciation).

You will also be able to opt-out this change in your preferences.

Concerning Watchlists

Starting on September 19, the Beta feature will have a new option. Watchlists will have all filters available now on the Beta Recent Changes improvements.

If you have already activated the Beta feature "⧼eri-rcfilters-beta-label⧽", you have no action to take. If you haven't activated the Beta feature "⧼eri-rcfilters-beta-label⧽" and you want to try the filters on Watchlists, please go to your Beta preferences on September 19.

How to be ready

Please share this announcement!

Do you use Gadgets that change things on your RecentChanges or Watchlist pages, or have you customized them with scripts or CSS? You may have to make some changes to your configuration. Despite the fact that we have tried to take most cases into consideration, some configurations may break. The Beta phase is a great opportunity to have a look at local scripts and gadgets: some of them may be replaced by native features from the Beta feature.

Please ping me if you have questions.

On behalf of the Global Collaboration team, Trizek (WMF) 15:27, 14. september 2017 (UTC)

Global preferences available for testing

Apologies for writing in English. Pomôžte prosím s prekladom do svojho jazyka.

Greetings,

Global preferences, a highly request feature in the 2016 Community Wishlist, is available for testing.

1. Read over the help page, it is brief and has screenshots
2. Login or register an account on Beta English Wikipedia
3. Visit Global Preferences and try enabling and disabling some settings
4. Visit some other language and project test wikis such as English Wikivoyage, the Hebrew Wikipedia and test the settings
5. Report your findings, experience, bugs, and other observations

Once the team has feedback on design issues, bugs, and other things that might need worked out, the problems will be addressed and global preferences will be sent to the wikis.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! --Keegan (WMF) (talk) 00:24, 27. február 2018 (UTC)

Notification from edit summary

Greetings,

The ability to notify other users in edit summaries will be available later this week, on 15 March 2018. Other users can be notified if a link to their user page is provided in an edit summary. Some user-made gadgets and scripts that automatically put user names in edit summaries may need to be changed to put a colon in the link, such as [[:User:Example]]. You can change how you receive these mention notifications in your preferences. This feature was highly requested in the 2017 Community Wishlist survey, and feedback is welcome.

Thanks, happy editing to you. -Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:09, 12. marec 2018 (UTC)

We need your feedback to improve Lua functions

Hello,

(I’m sorry for writing in English. Pomôžte prosím s prekladom do svojho jazyka)

If you’re regularly using Lua modules, creating and improving some of them, we need your feedback!

The Wikidata development team would like to provide more Lua functions, in order to improve the experience of people who write Lua scripts to reuse Wikidata's data on the Wikimedia projects. Our goals are to help harmonizing the existing modules across the Wikimedia projects, to make coding in Lua easier for the communities, and to improve the performance of the modules.

We would like to know more about your habits, your needs, and what could help you. We have a few questions for you on this page. Note that if you don’t feel comfortable with writing in English, you can answer in your preferred language.

Ďakujeme Lea Lacroix (WMDE) 08:55, 27. marec 2018 (UTC)

Wikitext highlighting out of beta

Wikitext syntax highlighting, also known as CodeMirror, has been moved out of Beta Features and is available in the 2017 Wikitext Editor on all wikis. Syntax highlighting helps you see problems in your wikitext before previewing or publishing text. Please try out the tool if you did not do so while it was being developed, and feedback is welcome. - Keegan (WMF) (talk)

18:55, 4. máj 2018 (UTC)

Improvements coming soon on Watchlists

Hello

Sorry to use English. Pomôžte prosím s prekladom do svojho jazyka! Děkujeme vám.

In short: starting on June 18, New Filters for Edit Review (now in Beta) will become standard on Watchlists. They provide an array of new tools and an improved interface. If you prefer the current page you will be able to opt out. Learn more about the New Filters.

What is this feature again?

This feature is used by default on Special:RecentChanges, Special:RecentChangesLinked and as a Beta feature on Special:Watchlist.

Based on a new design, that feature adds new functions to those pages, to ease vandalism tracking and support of newcomers:

• Filtering - filter recent changes with easy-to-use and powerful filters combinations, including filtering by namespace or tagged edits.
• Highlighting - add a colored background to the different changes you are monitoring. It helps quick identification of changes that matter to you.
• Bookmarking to keep your favorite configurations of filters ready to be used.
• Quality and Intent Filters - those filters use ORES predictions. They identify real vandalism or good faith intent contributions that need help. They are not available on all wikis.

You can know more about this project by visiting the quick tour help page.

About the release on Watchlists

Over 70,000 people have activated the New Filters beta, which has been in testing on Watchlist for more than eight months. We feel confident that the features are stable and effective, but if you have thoughts about these tools or the beta graduation, please let us know on the project talk page. In particular, tell us if you know of a special incompatibility or other issue that makes the New Filters problematic on your wiki. We’ll examine the blocker and may delay release on your wiki until the issue can be addressed.

The deployment will start on June 18 or on June 25, depending on the wiki (check the list). After the deployment, you will also be able to opt-out this change directly from the Watchlist page and also in your preferences.

How to be ready?

Please share this announcement!

If you use local Gadgets that change things on your Watchlist pages, or have a customized scripts or CSS, be ready. You may have to make some changes to your configuration. Despite the fact that we have tried to take most cases into consideration, some configurations may break. The Beta phase is a great opportunity to have a look at local scripts and gadgets: some of them may be replaced by native features from the Beta feature.

Please share your questions and comments on the feedback page.

On behalf of the Collaboration team, Trizek (WMF) 13:14, 7. jún 2018 (UTC)

Update on page issues on mobile web

Update on page issues on mobile web

Pomôžte prosím s prekladom do svojho jazyka Hi everyone. The Readers web team has recently begun working on exposing issue templates on the mobile website. Currently, details about issues with page content are generally hidden on the mobile website. This leaves readers unaware of the reliability of the pages they are reading. The goal of this project is to improve awareness of particular issues within an article on the mobile web. We will do this by changing the visual styling of page issues.

So far, we have drafted a proposal on the design and implementation of the project. We were also able to run user testing on the proposed designs. The tests so far have positive results. Here is a quick summary of what we learned:

• The new treatment increases awareness of page issues among participants. This is true particularly when they are in a more evaluative/critical mode.
• Page issues make sense to readers and they understand how they work
• Readers care about page issues and consider them important
• Readers had overwhelmingly positive sentiments towards Wikipedia associated with learning about page issues

Our next step would be to start implementing these changes. We wanted to reach out to you for any concerns, thoughts, and suggestions you might have before beginning development. Please visit the project page where we have more information and mockups of how this may look. Please leave feedback on the talk page.

CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 20:58, 12. jún 2018 (UTC)

Consultation on the creation of a separate user group for editing sitewide CSS/JS

(Pomôžte prosím s prekladom do svojho jazyka)

Hi all,

I'm preparing a change in who can edit sitewide CSS/JS pages. (These are pages like MediaWiki:Common.css and MediaWiki:Vector.js which are executed in the browser of all readers and editors.) Currently all administrators are able to edit these pages, which poses a serious and unnecessary security risk. Soon, a dedicated, smaller user group will take over this task. Your community will be able to decide who belongs in this group, so this should mean very little change for you. You can find out more and provide feedback at the consultation page on Meta. If you are involved in maintaining CSS/JS code, or policymaking around adminship requests, please give it a look!

Thanks!
Tgr (talk) 10:50, 9. júl 2018 (UTC) (via global message delivery)

Google Code-In will soon take place again! Mentor tasks to help new contributors!

Hi everybody! Google Code-in (GCI) will soon take place again - a seven week long contest for 13-17 year old students to contribute to free software projects. Tasks should take an experienced contributor about two or three hours and can be of the categories Code, Documentation/Training, Outreach/Research, Quality Assurance, and User Interface/Design. Do you have any Lua, template, gadget/script or similar task that would benefit your wiki? Or maybe some of your tools need better documentation? If so, and you can imagine enjoying mentoring such a task to help a new contributor, please check out mw:Google Code-in/2019 and become a mentor. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at our talk page. Many thanks in advance! --Martin Urbanec 07:28, 5. november 2019 (UTC)

Technical maintenance planed‬

A maintenance operation will be performed tomorrow morning UTC time (Wednesday 17th at 07:00 AM UTC).

It will impact all wikis and is supposed to last up to one minute.

During this time, new translations may fail, and Notifications may not be delivered. For more details about the operation and on all impacted services, please check on Phabricator.

A banner will be displayed 30 minutes before the operation.

Thank you, SGrabarczuk (WMF) 17:45, 16. február 2021 (UTC)

About deploying StructuredCategories in the Slovak Wikiquote

Hello,

I developed a Gadget that generates a link to a structured description of a given Wikimedia category based on the commonly used Wikidata statements to efficiently define its direct members. Please find the description of the Gadget at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Structured_Categories and its JavaScript source code at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Csisc/StructuredCategories.js. I ask how to deploy this tool in the Slovak Wikiquote so that it can be featured in the Preferences for users.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (diskusia) 15:28, 16. apríl 2021 (UTC)

Coolest Tool Award 2021: Call for nominations

The third edition of the m:Coolest Tool Award is looking for nominations!

Tools play an essential role for the Wikimedia projects, and so do the many volunteer developers who experiment with new ideas and develop and maintain local and global solutions to support the Wikimedia communities. The Coolest Tool Award aims to recognize and celebrate the coolest tools in a variety of categories.

The awarded projects will be announced and showcased in a virtual ceremony in December. Deadline to submit nominations is October 27. More information: m:Coolest Tool Award. Thanks for your recommendations! -- SSethi (WMF) for the 2021 Coolest Tool Academy team 05:57, 19. október 2021 (UTC)

Community Wishlist Survey 2022 is coming. Help us!

The Community Wishlist Survey 2022 starts in less than two weeks (Monday 10 January 2022, 18:00 UTC). We, the team organizing the Survey, need your help.

Translate important messages

Promote the Survey Among anyone and everyone you know who has an account on wiki. Promote the Survey on social media, via instant messaging apps, in other groups and chats, in your WikiProject, Wikimedia affiliate - wherever contributors with registered accounts may be.

Only you can make the difference

How many people will hear and read about the Survey in their language? How many will decide to participate? Will there be enough of you to vote for a change you would like to see? It all depends on you, volunteers.

Why are we asking?

• We have improved the documentation. It's friendlier and easier to use. This will mean little if it's only in English.
• Thousands of volunteers haven't participated in the Survey yet. We'd like to improve that, too. Three years ago, 1387 people participated. Last year, there were 1773 of them. We hope that in the upcoming edition, there will be even more. You are better than us in contacting Wikimedians outside of wikis. We have prepared some images to share. More to come.

What is the Community Wishlist Survey?

It's an annual survey that allows contributors to the Wikimedia projects to propose and vote for tools and platform improvements. Long years of experience in editing or technical skills are not required.

Thanks, and be safe and successful in 2022! SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 03:15, 29. december 2021 (UTC)

Save the Date: Coolest Tool Award 2021: this Friday, 17:00 UTC

<languages />

Hello all,

The ceremony of the 2021 Wikimedia Coolest Tool Award will take place virtually on Friday 14 January 2022, 17:00 UTC.

This award is highlighting software tools that have been nominated by contributors to the Wikimedia projects. The ceremony will be a nice moment to show appreciation to our tool developers and maybe discover new tools!

Read more about the livestream and the discussion channels.

Thanks for joining! andre (talk) -08:02, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Last two days for submitting proposals

Tomorrow is the last day for submitting proposals for the Community Wishlist Survey 2022.

Also, everyone is welcome to translate, promote, and discuss proposals. SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 14:45, 22. január 2022 (UTC)

Rollout of the new audio and video player

Pomôžte prosím s prekladom do svojho jazyka

Hello,

Over the next months we will gradually change the audio and video player of Wikis from Kultura to Video.js and with that, the old player won’t be accessible anymore. The new player has been active as a beta feature since May 2017.

The new player has many advantages, including better design, consistent look with the rest of our interface, better compatibility with browsers, ability to work on mobile which means our multimedia will be properly accessible on iPhone, better accessibility and many more.

The old player has been unmaintained for eight years now and is home-brewn (unlike the new player which is a widely used open source project) and uses deprecated and abandoned frameworks such as jQuery UI. Removing the old player’s code also improves performance of the Wikis for anyone visiting any page (by significantly reducing complexity of the dependency graph of our ResourceLoader modules. See this blog post.). The old player has many open bugs that we will be able to close as resolved after this migration.

The new player will solve a lot of old and outstanding issues but also it will have its own bugs. All important ones have been fixed but there will be some small ones to tackle in the future and after the rollout.

What we are asking now is to turn on the beta feature for the new player and let us know about any issues.

You can track the work in T100106

Thank you, Amir 17:59, 17. február 2022 (UTC)

Coolest Tool Award 2022: Call for nominations

The fourth edition of the Coolest Tool Award welcomes your nominations! What is your favorite Wikimedia related software tool? Please submit your favorite tools by October 12, 2022! The awarded projects will be announced and showcased in a virtual ceremony in December.

MediaWiki message delivery 18:30, 3. október 2022 (UTC)

Join the Coolest Tool Award 2022: Friday, Dec 16th, 17:00 UTC

The fourth edition of the Wikimedia Coolest Tool Award will happen online on Friday 16 December 2022 at 17:00 UTC!

This award is highlighting software tools that have been nominated by contributors to the Wikimedia projects. The ceremony will be a nice moment to show appreciation to our tool developers and maybe discover new tools!

Read more about the livestream and the discussion channels.

Thanks for joining! -Komla

MediaWiki message delivery 18:53, 5. december 2022 (UTC)